Regulatory Tracker

Natural Resources Law

National Monuments

Last updated:

August 20, 2024

Agencies

DOI

Grand Teton with its reflection in the Snake River at Schwabacher Landing in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming at sunrise.

Current Status

The Biden administration has worked to restore and expand national monument protections rolled back during the Trump administration and has declared several new ones. Some of its actions are being challenged in court by plaintiffs seeking to narrow the scope of the Antiquities Act.

Why it Matters

Our national monuments protect cultural and natural resources including historic landmarks, prehistoric structures, and objects of historic or scientific interest, like the Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Statue of Liberty, and over a hundred more significant sites. Under the Antiquities Act, the president can designate national monuments on federal lands, and Congress has designated or modified some monuments under its own authority.

Timeline

Biden Administration

Aug. 20, 2024 The state of Utah filed a bill of complaint with the Supreme Court challenging the federal government’s retention of “unappropriated” federal lands and seeking to order the US to dispose of those lands. 

Aug. 16, 2024 President Biden designated the Springfield 1908 Race Riot National Monument to “remember an unspeakable attack on the Black community and honor the Americans who came together in its aftermath to help deliver on the promise of civil rights.”

June 10, 2024 Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs, and Arizona Attorney General Kristen Mayes filed a motion to intervene as defendants in the lawsuit challenging the establishment of the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni–Ancestral Footprints Monument, arguing that the monument designation does not harm Arizona. Arizona State Legislature et al., v. Biden, No. 3:24-cv-08026-PCT-SMM consolidated with No. 3:24-cv-08027-PHX-DLR (D. Ariz.).

May 2, 2024 President Biden signed proclamations expanding the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument and the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument in California, protecting 120,000 acres of land.

April 24, 2024 The Havasupai Tribe, Hopi Tribe and Navajo Nation filed a motion to intervene in support of the government in the lawsuit challenging the establishment of the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni–Ancestral Footprints Monument, arguing that the monument designation does not harm Arizona. Arizona State Legislature et al., v. Biden, No. 3:24-cv-08026-PCT-SMM consolidated with No. 3:24-cv-08027-PHX-DLR (D. Ariz.).

Mar. 25, 2024 The Supreme Court denied certiorari in the challenge to the Cascade-Siskiyou monument, leaving the District Court rulings upholding the monument in place.

Feb. 12, 2024 The Arizona legislature and an Arizona rancher represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation filed a pair of lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona challenging the Biden Administration’s 2023 decision to establish the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument under the Antiquities Act. Mirroring ongoing litigation in Utah over the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments, the lawsuits argue that the monument is too large and will improperly curtail other uses of the federal land. Arizona State Legislature et al v. Biden et al, Docket No. 3:24-cv-08026 (D. Ariz.); Heaton v. Biden et al, Docket No. 3:24-cv-08027 (D. Ariz.).

Feb. 9, 2024 Plaintiffs-appellants challenging the Utah monument designations, including the Utah plaintiffs and the Dalton plaintiffs, filed their reply briefs. On Mar. 14, the court scheduled oral argument for the week of September 23-27, 2024. Dalton et al. v. Biden et al., Docket no. 23-04107 (10th Cir.). 

Dec. 19, 2023 and Jan. 9, 2024 Defendants-appellees, including the federal government, the tribes, and conservation groups, filed their response briefs defending the Utah monument designations. Dalton et al. v. Biden et al., Docket no. 23-04107 (10th Cir.).

Aug. 15, 2023, Garfield County, Utah, et al. v. Biden, et al., Docket No. 23-04106 (10th Cir.), and one on Aug. 16, Dalton, et al. v. Biden, et al., Docket No. 23-04107 (10th Cir.). On Oct 30, 2023, the appellants filed their brief, again arguing that the Biden administration’s restoration of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments exceeded executive authority under the Antiquities Act. Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al., Docket No. 23-04106 (10th Cir.).

Aug. 11, 2023 A judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah dismisses a challenge to the Biden administration’s restoration of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments under the Antiquities Act brought by Utah and two Utah counties, holding that sovereign immunity blocks judicial review under the act except in limited circumstances. Plaintiffs file a notice of appeal to the Tenth Circuit on the same day. Garfield County v. Biden, 4:22-cv-00059 (D. Utah). Two cases are docketed with the Tenth Circuit: one on 

Aug. 8, 2023: President Biden signs a proclamation creating a national monument, Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument, around the Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona. The national monument will protect lands significant to 12 Native American tribes. 

July 18, 2023 The DC Circuit rules that the Obama administration lawfully expanded the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, an expansion that was challenged by logging interests. The court rejects claims that the Antiquities Act conflicts with the O & C Act, a law governing timberland in parts of Oregon and California. The court held that under federal law, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was allowed to consider conservation values in timber harvest decisions and that BLM resource management plans governing the forest did not contravene federal law by limiting the areas open to logging.  Am. Forest Res. Couns. v. US, D.C. Cir., No. 20-05008.

April 24, 2023 The Ninth Circuit upholds the Obama administration’s decision to expand the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument. The court rejects a timber company’s claims that the Antiquities Act conflicts with the O & C act, a law governing timberland in parts of California and Oregon.

March 21, 2023 President Biden establishes new monuments in Nevada and Texas. The Avi Kwa Ame and Castner Range National Monuments reflect the White House’s goals of protecting cultural heritage and providing access to the outdoors in all communities. 

Jan. 5, 2023 The Biden administration files a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought by the state of Utah and counties challenging 2 Utah national monuments. The government argues that the Court should dismiss Plaintiffs’ arguments for “contradicting the plain text of the Antiquities Act, overlooking on-point Supreme Court precedent, and mischaracterizing the challenged Proclamations.” Garfield County et al v. Biden et al, Docket No. 4:22-cv-00059 (D. Utah).

Nov. 16, 2022 The DC Circuit hears oral argument in the challenge to the Obama administration’s expansion of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument. American Forest Resource County v. USA, et al, Docket No. 20-05008 (D.C. Cir.) and Association of O&C Counties v. Joseph Biden, et al, Docket No. 20-05011 (D.C. Cir.).

Nov. 23, 2022 Tribes and environmental groups ask the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah to intervene as defendants in the lawsuit brought by Utah and two counties challenging the boundaries of Bears Ears. Garfield County et al v. Biden et al, Docket No. 4:22-cv-00059 (D. Utah).

Oct. 12, 2022 President Biden issues a proclamation creating the first new national monument of his administration: Camp Hale-Continental Divide. Encompassing approximately 54,000 acres in north-central Colorado, the monument preserves both the landscape and American history. Camp Hale once housed America’s first and only mountain infantry division, the 10th Mountain Division.

August 26, 2022 The Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, which includes the Hopi, Navajo (Diné), Ute Indian Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute, and Zuni Tribes, releases a collaborative land management plan for Bears Ears National Monument. The plan synthesizes Tribal views on land management to provide “the context in which Tribal Nations seek to be regularly and fully engaged with Federal land managers,” emphasizing “a holistic approach to all resources that gives primacy to indigenous knowledge and perspectives on the stewardship of the Bear’s Ears landscape.”

July 24, 2022 Utah and two Utah counties file a lawsuit in US District Court for the District of Utah challenging the Biden Administration’s decision to re-establish the boundaries of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments under the Antiquities Act. They argue that the size of the national monuments violates the Antiquities Act, though in his Bears Ears proclamation, Biden stated that the re-established boundaries represented “the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects of historic and scientific interest.”

July 29, 2022 DOI announces that it will prepare a new Resource Management Plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Comments are open until Sept. 27, 2022.

June 18, 2022 The Biden administration reaches an agreement to give five Native American tribes more day-to-day management over Bears Ears National Monument. The cooperative agreement between Dept. of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, and five tribes that have inhabited land surrounding the monument, the Hopi Tribe, the Navajo Nation, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, and the Pueblo of Zuni, lays out cooperative management of the monument.

May 17, 2022 The Utah Legislative Management Committee approve a land swap involving Bears Ears National Monument. The Utah School Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) plans to trade 161,000 acres of land it holds inside the monument’s boundaries in exchange for 164,000 acres of federal land across the state. A similar SITLA exchange took place when President Clinton designated the Grand Staircase-Escalante monument.

Dec. 2021 DOI and the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) begin work on a memorandum of understanding to exchange 135,000 acres of state-owned land inside the Bears Ears National Monument’s new boundaries. As part of President Biden’s October Proclamation resetting the monument’s boundaries, the President instructed Secretary Haaland to “explore” an exchange of state in-holdings “for land of approximately equal value managed by the BLM outside of the boundary of the monument.” At the same time, Utah Governor Spencer Cox and state Attorney General Sean Reyes have said they will file suit challenging the monument’s creation in 2016 as a violation of the Antiquities Act.

Oct. 9, 2021 President Biden signs a series of executive orders restoring the boundaries of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. The orders do not address whether President Trump’s reduction of those boundaries was a valid exercise of authority under the Antiquities Act.

April 12, 2021 Dozens of House and Senate Democratic lawmakers send a letter to President Biden and Interior Secretary Haaland supporting a proposal by Native American Tribes to expand Bears Ears National Monument to 1.9 million acres, and restore more than 2 million acres of public lands to both Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante.

March 17, 2021 Interior Secretary Haaland delays recommendations to President Biden on restoring the boundaries and conditions of Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts monuments in order to meet in-person with stakeholders in Utah. 

March 8, 2021 The US District Court for the District of Columbia stays litigation over Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. Hope Tribe v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-02590 (D.D.C.); Wilderness Society v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-02587 (D.D.C.).

Jan. 20, 2021 President Biden issues an Executive Order establishing a policy to “restore and expand our national treasures and monuments,” and specifically recommending the Secretary of the Interior to determine whether to restore the boundaries of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante to their pre-January 20, 2017 boundaries within 60 days.

Trump Administration

Feb. 6, 2020 The Dept. of the Interior releases a new RMP for Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, a Monument Management Plan (MMP) for Bears Ears National Monument, and an RMP for public lands that were previously a part of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Kanab-Escalante Planning Area). The plans open up much of the Monuments to grazing, allow for increased logging in both monuments, and permit coal and other mineral mining in areas the Trump administration carved out of the monuments in 2017.

Jan. 24, 2020 The Dept. of the Interior and a coalition of environmental groups file separate notices of appeal at the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. Both groups seek to overturn a November 2019 ruling saying that the Obama administration’s expansion of Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument violated the 1938 O&C Act. Association of O&C Counties v. Donald Trump, No. 20-5011 (D.C. Cir.); American Forest Resource Council v. United States of America, No. 20-5008 (D.C. Cir.). For an analysis of litigation challenging the expansion of Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, read our blog post: Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument Litigation May Cause Circuit Split.

Nov. 22, 2019 the US District Court for the District of Columbia rules that the Presidential Proclamation expanding Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument unlawfully violates a 1937 statute that regulates timber harvest on federal land in Western Oregon (the Oregon and California Railroad and Coos Bay Wagon Road Grant Lands Act of 1937). American Forest Resource Council v. Hammond, No. 16-1599 (D.D.C.).

Nov. 4, 2019 Industry appeals Murphy Company v. Trump to the 9th Circuit. Murphy Company v. Trump, No. 19-35921 (9th Cir.)

Sept. 30, 2019 The US District Court for the District of Columbia denies the government’s motion to dismiss the Bears Ears suit Hopi Tribe v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-02590 (D.D.C.).

Sep. 5, 2019 the US District Court for the District of Oregon adopts the magistrate judge’s April report holding that the President had the legal authority to expand the monument the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument. Murphy Company v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-00285-CL (D. Or.).

Aug. 24, 2017 Interior Secretary Zinke proposes scaling back Grand Staircase-Escalante and Cascade-Siskiyou, and revising the management plan, specifically mentioning the “impacts on commercial timber production.”

Aug. 23, 2019 BLM releases the final environmental impact statement for the reduced Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument in Utah. The proposal includes opening more area to energy development. On Oct. 17, 2019 BLM modifies the final plan to respond to additional public comments regarding cultural resources, livestock grazing, and consideration of alternative RMPs.

Oct. 12, 2017 An environmental law firm sues DOJ for failing to respond to its FOIA request from February 6, 2017.

Nov. 2, 2017 Environmental groups sue DOI for failure to respond to multiple FOIA requests (dated from March 3, 2017 – September 1, 2017) relating to Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and Zinke’s August 24, 2017 report.

Dec. 4, 2017 President Trump announces that he is reducing Bears Ears National Monument area by 85% and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument by almost half. That same day, lawsuits are filed by Earthjustice, on behalf of eight conservation organizations, and by a coalition of five native American tribes in the DC District Court, stating the president’s proclamation is unlawful. Cases 1:17-cv-02587 and 1:17-cv-02590.

Dec. 4, 2017 President Trump announces he is cutting Grand Staircase-Escalante by almost half. Among others, a coalition of conservation groups files a lawsuit in the DC District Court, calling this action unlawful. Wilderness Society v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-02587 (D.D.C).

Dec. 5, 2017 Interior Secretary Zinke’s report to President Trump on monument and sanctuary recommendations, which was issued in August 2017, is finally made public. His recommendations include changing the management plans to, and boundaries of, several monuments to allow for more extractive uses (such as logging, mining, and hunting). Zinke also recommends creating new monuments in Kentucky, Montana, and Mississippi.

Secretary Zinke recommended changes to the following monuments’ management plans:

  • Cascade-Siskiyou
  • Gold Butte
  • Katahdin Woods and Waters
  • Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks
  • Rio Grande del Norte

Jan. 30, 2018 The D.C. District Court consolidates the Bears Ears lawsuits into one case. Hopi Tribe v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-02590 (D.D.C.). 

Feb. 2, 2018 Land that President Trump removes from Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments is opened to new mining claims.

Aug. 15, 2018 BLM releases draft management plans and a draft environmental impact statement for Bears Ears National Monument, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, and the lands now called Kanab-Escalante Planning Area that were part of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument before President Trump removed them. 

Oct. 5, 2018 The state of Utah moves to join a lawsuit challenging the establishment of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments. Utah seeks to join the Trump administration in arguing for a reduction in the size of the monuments. Utah cited economic impacts as well as “sovereign interests” in its decision to join the lawsuit.

Jan. 14, 2019 The state of Utah as well as the Utah and American Farm Bureaus joined multiple lawsuits in support of the Trump administration’s decision to shrink the Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments.

July 26, 2019 BLM releases the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Bears Ears.

April 2, 2019 A magistrate judge for the US District Court for the District of Oregon recommends dismissing an industry challenge to Pres. Obama’s 2017 expansion of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument. The magistrate found that President Obama acted within his authority under the Antiquities Act to expand the monument, and was not precluded from doing so by the O&C Act which also applies to the lands in question. The magistrate’s report and recommendations have been referred to the district judge.

April 16, 2019 San Juan County, Utah files a motion withdrawing from a suit defending the decision to shrink Bears Ears National Monument.

 

 

Aug. 24, 2017 Secretary Zinke submits his final recommendations for closing or shrinking monuments to the White House. The report is not made public, prompting environmental groups to later submit multipleFOIA requests.

Aug. 16, 2017 Top officials at the Department of the Interior direct the Park Service deputy director to rescind Order #100. Issued on Dec. 20, 2016, the order emphasized decision-making based on the “best available sound science and scholarship” and adopted the “precautionary principle” as a guiding strategy for resource management. The order also recognized climate change as an important background factor for NPS to consider in its resource management decisions. 

June 12, 2017 Interior Secretary Zinke proposes significantly scaling back the Bears Ear monument. 

May 11, 2017 Department of Interior (DOI) asks for public comment on whether to revise twenty-seven national monuments (including five marine monuments). . Public comments total nearly three million, and are overwhelmingly in favor of maintaining current borders and protections. Interior Secretary Zinke dismisses them as a “well-orchestrated national campaign organized by multiple organizations.” 21 onshore monuments are listed for review because they are at least 100,000 acres, and one – Katahdin Woods, in Maine – is called out to “determine whether the designation or expansion was made without adequate public outreach and coordination with relevant stakeholders.”

April 26, 2017 President Trump signs Executive Order 13792, directing the Secretary of the Interior to review all National Monuments designated or expanded since January 1, 1996 under the Antiquities Act that are at least 100,000 acres or were made “without adequate public outreach and coordination.”

Feb. 6, 2017 An environmental law firm submits a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Justice (DOJ) seeking “‘final legal advice’ relating to the president’s authority to designate, withdraw, expand, or modify national monuments under the Antiquities Act.”

1906: The Antiquity Act

June 8, 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt signs the Antiquity Act. This revolutionary act authorizes the president to protect public lands without having to go through Congress. Since then, presidents of both parties have established 117 national monuments in 31 states, Washington, DC, and several territories.