Skip to content
Menu

Trackers

  • Regulatory Tracker
  • Environmental Justice Tracker

Research Topics

  • Administrative Law
  • Clean Air
  • Clean Cars
  • Clean Water
  • Corporate Climate Risk
  • Environmental Justice
  • Methane Emissions
  • Power Sector

All Topics

About EELP

  • Mission and Approach
  • EELP Team
  • Students
  • Electricity Law Initiative
  • Legal Analysis
  • CleanLaw Podcast
  • Advisory Board
  • EELP in the News
  • Support Our Work
  • Contact Us

Latest News

  • US Urges the Supreme Court to Stop Climate Suits While EPA Questions Authority to Regulate Emissions
  • The Endangerment Finding and the DOE Climate Science Report
  • When is Expertise-Based Deference Warranted?

CleanLaw Podcast

  • CleanLaw — How Maine Became a Heat Pump Leader

Topic

Administrative Law

EELP analyzes the evolution of administrative law — including recent Supreme Court decisions — and works with stakeholders and scholars on responses to recent anti-regulatory decisions by the courts to ensure the federal government can effectively address complex social and environmental problems.

Administrative Law

Media Inquiries

  • Legal Analysis

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine, Expands Power of Judiciary

An overview of the majority decision and dissent in the SCOTUS decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine.

July 12, 2024

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine, Expands Power of Judiciary
  • EELP News

Supreme Court Decision Affecting Agency Rulemakings

On June 28, The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 1984 decision known as Chevron doctrine. Jody Freeman and Andy Mergen have been answering questions about Chevron and the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision.

July 1, 2024

Supreme Court Decision Affecting Agency Rulemakings
  • EELP News

Jody Freeman and Andrew Mergen, Reply to David French, Undoing ‘Chevron’ Would Duly Shift Power Back to Congress

Overturning Chevron would mean that the judiciary, and especially the Supreme Court — not Congress — will more often have the last word on many important questions of policy (or mixed law and policy) that arise under federal law.

January 31, 2024

Jody Freeman and Andrew Mergen, Reply to David French, Undoing ‘Chevron’ Would Duly Shift Power Back to Congress
  • EELP News

Jody Freeman and Andrew Mergen Op-Ed: Will the Supreme Court Show a Little Humility?

How two cases argued at the Supreme Court yesterday could restrict the authority of federal agencies and upend decades of precedent.

January 18, 2024

  • CleanLaw Podcast

CleanLaw — The Endangered Species Act at 50: Potent Statute, Risky Future

Richard Lazarus and Andy Mergen discuss the initial bipartisan support for the ESA, the Supreme Court cases that shaped its implementation, and risks it may face in the future.

January 17, 2024

CleanLaw — The Endangered Species Act at 50: Potent Statute, Risky Future
  • EELP News

Judicial Destruction of the Clean Water Act: Sackett v. EPA

Professor Richard Lazarus wrote an essay for the University of Chicago Law Review about the Supreme Court’s Sackett v. EPA ruling. In the first part he describes the ruling, reasoning, […]

September 12, 2023

  • Legal Analysis

Held v. Montana: A Win for Young Climate Advocates and What It Means for Future Litigation

How this case reached the Court in the first place, implications of the use of the major questions doctrine, and EPA’s path forward.

August 30, 2023

Held v. Montana: A Win for Young Climate Advocates and What It Means for Future Litigation
  • CleanLaw Podcast

CleanLaw — The Loper Bright Case and Fate of the Chevron Doctrine with Jody Freeman and Andy Mergen

Jody and Andy discuss how the Supreme Court might overrule the Chevron doctrine and what the case might mean for other environmental and federal regulations.

August 23, 2023

CleanLaw — The Loper Bright Case and Fate of the Chevron Doctrine with Jody Freeman and Andy Mergen
  • CleanLaw Podcast

Sackett v. EPA Decision: What the Justices Said and What this Means for Water with Jody Freeman, Richard Lazarus, and Steph Tai

Jody Freeman speaks with Richard Lazarus and Steph Tai about the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sackett v. EPA. They discuss how the Court’s reliance on a dictionary definition of waters will drastically limit Clean Water Act protections: severely shrinking what qualifies as covered wetlands and streams, and as a result, enfeebling the federal government’s ability to protect US water quality.

June 21, 2023

Sackett v. EPA Decision: What the Justices Said and What this Means for Water with Jody Freeman, Richard Lazarus, and Steph Tai

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Environmental & Energy
Law Program at Harvard Law School

6 Everett Street, Suite 4119
Cambridge, MA 02138
(617) 495-1857

Emmett Environmental Law Center

Connect

  • Student Opportunities
  • Media Inquiries
  • Support Our Work

Resources

  • Regulatory Tracker
  • Federal Environmental Justice Tracker
  • CleanLaw Podcast
  • Research Areas
  • EELP in the News

Follow us

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Blue Sky
  • YouTube

Subscribe to EELP updates




© 2025 Harvard Law School. All Rights Reserved. | Digital Accessibility