Power Sector Regulations
The Biden administration set a goal of creating a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035 and net zero emissions economy-wide by 2050. To achieve those targets, the administration is taking a whole-of-government approach. EPA has a key role in the regulatory effort for the power sector. Below is a compilation of our legal analyses, podcasts, and tracker posts about the Biden administration’s efforts to advance these rules, including rebuilding the regulations that the Trump administration rolled back.
greenhouse gas emissionsRead more
Regulatory Trackers Our Regulatory Tracker post on GHG emissions regulation for existing power plants gives the background and timeline of events starting with the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan to the Trump administration’s Affordable Clean Energy rule and the Biden administration’s proposed regulations. Our Regulatory Tracker post on regulation of GHG emissions for new, modified, and reconstructed power plants is here.
Legal Analysis In EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Power Plants are Consistent with Statutory Factors and Market Trends Carrie Jenks, Hannah Oakes Dobie, Sara Dewey, and Hannah Perls summarize EPA’s long-awaited power sector GHG rule. (May 19, 2023) You can also see a visual quick take of the proposed rule here. (May 11, 2023)
Podcast Listen to our podcast on EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Power Plants with Carrie, Jody Freeman, Jay Duffy, and Kevin Poloncarz here. (May 23, 2023)
Legal Analysis Supreme Court Embraces the Major Questions Doctrine as Limiting but Leaving the Door Open for Power Sector GHG Regulations. In this analysis, Carrie Jenks, Hannah Oakes Dobie, and Sara Dewey describe how this case reached the Court in the first place, implications of the use of the major questions doctrine, and EPA’s path forward. (July 1, 2022)
Podcast West Virginia v. EPA, What’s Next? In this podcast our founding director Professor Jody Freeman and Professor Richard Lazarus discuss the Supreme Court case West Virginia v. EPA. The Court’s decision in this case will address the scope of EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector, potentially impacting future EPA rules. (March 31, 2022)
Legal Analysis In a guest essay, Jody wrote Will the Supreme Court Frustrate Efforts to Slow Climate Change? for the New York Times. (February 26, 2022)
Podcast In this podcast Carrie Jenks spoke with expert Kevin Poloncarz about the appeals to the Supreme Court of the D.C. Circuit decision to vacate the Trump Administration’s Affordable Clean Energy Rule. (September 8, 2021)
Legal Analysis In a white paper and podcast Joe Goffman and Caitlin McCoy discuss the Trump EPA’s proposed power plant rules. “EPA’s House of Cards: the Affordable Clean Energy Rule” (October 22, 2019) analyzes the risky legal strategy EPA used to repeal the Clean Power Plan and craft the ACE rule. The authors of the paper, our former executive director Joe Goffman and staff attorney Caitlin McCoy, discussed their findings in an episode of our podcast. They also discussed the litigation challenging the repeal and new rule, with updates including petitioners’ motion to hold the case in abeyance pending EPA’s issuing the final New Source Review rule, which was initially included in the ACE proposal. (November 19, 2019)
Podcast Joe also spoke with public health expert Kathy Fallon Lambert in our podcast about the expected emissions increases under the Affordable Clean Energy Rule on an episode of our podcast (October 8, 2019)
Mercury and air toxics standards (mats)Read more
Backgrounder Carrie Jenks and Hannah Oakes Dobie assess EPA’s proposed changes from the 2012 MATS, in EPA’s proposed MATS residual risk and technology review.
Legal Analysis Student Kipper Berven (JD 2024) summarizes and analyzes the legal impacts of EPA’s final rule reaffirming that it is “appropriate and necessary” to limit hazardous air pollution from power plants.
Regulatory Tracker Our MATS post tracks the timeline of events from the Obama administration’s publication of the rule and determination that it was “appropriate and necessary” to the Trump administration’s reversal of that determination to the Biden administration’s suspension of the Trump reversal and proposal for mercury regulation.
Legal Analysis Student Anna Todd (JD 2023) looks at EPA’s Authority to Regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants from Power Plants: the Appropriate and Necessary Finding. (March 9, 2022)
Backgrounder This post provides background on EPA’s pending final rule withdrawing the appropriate and necessary finding that underpins the MATS and offers key points to look for in the final rule. (April 16, 2020)
Legal Analysis Joe Goffman examined the Trump administration’s strategy to roll back MATS, then focused on the proposal to rescind the supplemental appropriate and necessary finding. (March 14, 2019)
Timeline Joe Goffman wrote a timeline of MATS regulatory actions and litigation. (March 13, 2019)
Podcast Public health expert Kathy Fallon Lambert spoke with Joe Goffman about studies highlighting the potential impact of two Trump EPA proposals – withdrawing the “appropriate and necessary” foundation of MATS and replacing the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy Rule. (March 7, 2019)
Podcast Janet McCabe and Joe Goffman led the team that developed the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards under the Obama administration. Hear them discuss the effects of the Trump administration proposal to remove the legal foundation of the rule. (February, 2019)
Legal Analyses Joe examined the expected Trump proposal to rescind or revise a 2016 “supplemental finding” that, after considering the cost of regulation, it is “appropriate and necessary” to regulate power plant hazardous air pollutants. (December 21, 2018). This was published on the heels of Joe’s Preview: Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) – EPA Review. (December 17, 2018)
Legal Analysis In response to the Trump administration’s announcement that it would be reviewing the pollution control requirements of MATS as well as the appropriate and necessary finding, Joe wrote an extensive background of the rule and analysis of the stakes of these reviews. (September 28, 2018)
Cross-state air pollution rule (CSAPR) and 2023 Good neighbor planRead more
Legal Analysis and Podcast Carrie Jenks and Hannah Oakes Dobie assess EPA’s final Good Neighbor Plan Rule, which implements a cross-state air pollution plan for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS. In our CleanLaw podcast they discuss how the rule’s new design features will refine EPA’s longstanding air transport program to require power plants to reduce smog-forming pollutants.
Regulatory Tracker Our Air Transport Rules History page tracks the legal history and litigation of CSAPR and the Good Neighbor Plan.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter and OzoneRead more
Regulatory Tracker Read our National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Regulatory Tracker.
Regulatory Tracker Read our National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone Regulatory Tracker.
Regulatory Tracker Read our National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter (PM) Regulatory Tracker.
new source reviewRead more
Regulatory Tracker Our New Source Review Regulatory Tracker post details the history of the rule, why it’s important, and a timeline of events.
White Paper In this analysis we discussed the Trump EPA’s changes to the New Source Review program and what effects these changes would have on air quality and public health. (October 31, 2019)
coal ash ruleRead more
Regulatory Tracker Our Coal Ash post details the history of the rule, why it’s important, and a timeline of events.
Legal Analysis In her paper The Coal Ash Rule Trilogy Spanning Obama, Trump, and the D.C. Circuit, HLS student Katherine Clements (JD 2021) reviews three coal ash rules—the 2015 Rule, the 2018 Amendments, and the 2019 Proposed Rule—specifically comparing each rule’s coal ash impoundment closure initiation deadlines, alternative closure extensions, and consideration of cost. Comparing these three elements revealed the administrations’ differing regulatory priorities, and also examined the impact of the court’s decision. (January 28, 2020)
Once in always in guidance for Major Sources under the Clean Air Act
Power Plant Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Rule
Power Plant Effluent Limits
regional haze rule